On 16.08.2017 12:51, Mattias Gaertner via Lazarus wrote:
When you propose a new string type "dynamicstring" you have to define these
operators.
BTW, it will be good to have "Cstring" (or another name, not
"dynamicstring") :
- [] operator is 0-based like Python/C
- s[i] is DWORD per char (for all Unicode chars from 0 to MaxDWORD codes)
PChar(s)/PWChar(s) wont work for it? so it is not ok idea? But this type
can be compressed inside, eg in utf8. S[i] is DWORD outside. It is like
some class.
--
Regards,
Alexey
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
