On 16.08.2017 14:22, Alexey via Lazarus wrote:
BTW, it will be good to have "Cstring" (or another name, not
"dynamicstring") : ...
You are missing the point the paper is supposed to be about: enhancing
the versatility of the library functions such as those using TStrings.
Not just creating another type of strings, which is nothing but a
prerequisite for the main purpose.
-Michael
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org
https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
