On 16/08/2017 20:44, Juha Manninen via Lazarus wrote:
So using "char" (the type) as reference to "codepoint" is something we have to do, because today the type "char" is for codepoints.Sorry I didn't understand this one. "Char" (the type) holds a codeunit, not a codepoint. Char is either 1
Right yes. Genuine mistake with all the confusion.... -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list Lazarus@lists.lazarus-ide.org https://lists.lazarus-ide.org/listinfo/lazarus
