2010/1/16 Vincent Snijders <[email protected]>: > > It did not happen to me. I spent several days to get reasonably[1] working > git repo, so I could use git as a client on the Lazarus svn repo, and I > failed.
Not to rehash and old thread, but there is a big difference between the "convenience of Git wrapping a SVN repository" and a native true Git repository. With the first option, it is for convenience only (full history, search history, local commits, local branches etc. [1]), but you still loose a huge amount of the true Git features (all the previous features, plus use speed increase in pulling/pushing, much better branch history etc.). So never compare the two usages as the same thing. A native Git repository is very different in functionality. [1]. Downsides of Git wrapping SVN repository: Slow communication speed, linear history only, etc... -- Regards, - Graeme - _______________________________________________ fpGUI - a cross-platform Free Pascal GUI toolkit http://opensoft.homeip.net/fpgui/ -- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
