Sven Barth schrieb:
On 30.12.2011 16:23, Marco van de Voort wrote:
Dunno, I also wonder when this (Unicode strings) change will be really
finished :-(
I don't know what that has to do with it. Current docs describe the 2.6
branch not the 2.7 branch which has unicodestrings. But these files are
already unmaintained from before the 2.6 branch existed, so I don't know
what they are for.
They are code page aware strings, not unicodestrings. :)
That are two different string types and the latter existed already in
2.4 and maybe earlier ;)
I wonder how strings with different encoding will work together, without
kind of Unicode strings - be UTF-8 or UTF-16.
I also wonder what's the benefit of using strings with different
encodings together, when every other string operation will require a
codepage translation...
DoDi
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
Lazarus@lists.lazarus.freepascal.org
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
