2006/5/11, Michael Van Canneyt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Thu, 11 May 2006, Micha Nelissen wrote: > Michael Van Canneyt wrote: >> Whatever the answer, I'd rather go for the OpenOffice format: >> it's an open standard. > > Open Standard or 'de facto' Standard ? Open, I would say ?
Yes, odt files & al. are open format. And as of 1 may 2006 it is now an official ISO 26300 approved format (as other format like PDF and HTML who are also ISO approved). OASIS / ISO http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office http://www.iso.org/iso/en/CatalogueDetailPage.CatalogueDetail?CSNUMBER=43485&scopelist=PROGRAMME More info: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenDocument (In all url, change 'en' for 'fr' to get the french version. Might work for other languages as well.) I'm very much for the open document format, but I don't know if it can serve a help file very easely. But I suggested that format in another thread :) Regards. -- Alexandre Leclerc _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
