I must have missed something basic in this thread. What is/was CodeGear's reaction to Lazarus?
On Nov 12, 2007 7:25 AM, Bee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It means actually that Codegear is doing very bad. In a commercial > > company, this is usually the last step before bancruptcy or dropping > > the product. > > Personally, I don't want to see Delphi got dropped nor CodeGear got > bankrupt. For Lazarus own goodness, Delphi must be alive. We need > competition, in a healthy manner of course. Competition is good for each > product as each naturally don't want to lose from another. Competition > brings good quality products. Competition makes users happy as well > since they have options to choose. > > However, I do hope FPC/Lazarus would win the battle. CodeGear reaction > obviously shows that as indication. :-D FYI, I have never use my Delphi > (7) since I used Laz 9.22. Now I'm anxiously waiting for Laz 9.24! :-D > However, one thing I do really miss Delphi's dynamic package on > FPC/Lazarus. ;) > > -Bee- > > has Bee.ography at: > http://beeography.wordpress.com > > > _________________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with > "unsubscribe" as the Subject > archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives > -- Howard Lee Harkness 214 269 1171 _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
