On Jan 25, 2008 6:23 PM, Ales Katona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, and I'm not 100% sure of what everything that would constitute (eg: > I don't think there's a valid blockchar in multibyte range), but for 99% > of usages the current blockchars (+ whitechars) which are < 127 seem to > be working fine.
That's not enougth. It already works for ascii characters today. Please test with both unicode and non-unicode IDE on strings with accented characters. I am also working on that and it ain't that easy, I can tell for sure. > P.S: I think synedit will need a lot more work to be 100% "utf-8 ready" > on all fronts. All the "set of char" things will have to go and we'd > have to implement utf-8 "utf8string[x]" operations/functions (afaik fpc > doesn't have them yet?) You mean like that: http://svn.freepascal.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/trunk/lcl/lclproc.pas?root=lazarus&r1=13868&r2=13867&pathrev=13868 ? -- Felipe Monteiro de Carvalho _________________________________________________________________ To unsubscribe: mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe" as the Subject archives at http://www.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailarchives
