Hi Octave, Thanks for your reply.
We're using LDOM 1.0 And you are correct to say that guest is connected to e1000g1 via primary-vsw1. Thanks, -Geoff ----- Original Message ----- From: "Octave Orgeron" <[email protected]> To: "Geoff Tait" <geoff.tait at gmail.com>; <ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 11:59 PM Subject: Re: [ldoms-discuss] LDOM guest networking > Hi, > > Are you running LDM 1.0 or 1.0.1? I see that your guest domain's vnet > interface is tied to primary-vsw1, which is e1000g1, is that correct? > > *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* > Octave J. Orgeron > Solaris Systems Engineer > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/sysadmin/ > http://unixconsole.blogspot.com > unixconsole at yahoo.com > *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Geoff Tait <geoff.tait at gmail.com> > To: ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2007 6:47:04 PM > Subject: [ldoms-discuss] LDOM guest networking > > > Hi, > > Let me preface this by saying I've only used LDOMs for the past couple > of weeks, sort of got thrown into it when the admin working with them > quit. > > We have some T2000s with 1 primary and 1 guest domain. Primary's are > set up and working fine, can't get guest's networking to work. > > This is how I have it set up after reading: > http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/ldoms/files/intro_to_ldoms2_usenix.pdf > > Vsw: primary-vsw0 [num_clients=0] > mac-addr=0:14:4f:f9:8e:b5 > net-dev=e1000g0 > mode=prog,promisc > > Vsw: primary-vsw1 [num_clients=1] > mac-addr=0:14:4f:fa:80:f > net-dev=e1000g1 > mode=prog,promisc > > Vnet: vnet1 > mac-addr=0:14:4f:fb:f2:a3 > service: primary-vsw1 @ primary > > > I have the primary set up as: > > e1000g0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 > index 2 > inet 10.40.1.58 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.40.1.63 > ether 0:14:4f:a7:4f:a4 > > guest is: > > vnet0: flags=1000843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST,IPv4> mtu 1500 > index 2 > inet 10.40.1.90 netmask ffffffe0 broadcast 10.40.1.95 > ether 0:14:4f:fb:f2:a3 > > # cat /etc/defaultrouter > 10.40.1.94 > # ping 10.40.1.94 > no answer from 10.40.1.94 > > > We have net0 and net1 cabled, each going to a separate switch, each on > different vlans. > > Thanks for any help you can provide, > -Geoff > -- > This message was posted from opensolaris.org > _______________________________________________ > ldoms-discuss mailing list > ldoms-discuss at opensolaris.org > http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/ldoms-discuss > > > > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Be a better friend, newshound, and > know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. > http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ >
