On Monday 02 April 2007 20:06, Shane Hathaway wrote: > I wonder how those involved in that article would feel about splitting > the article into primary vs. secondary information.
I think that's an excellent idea, and would probably be very well-received by those who are interested in NPOV and clear exposition of the known facts. Those whose agenda is to confuse wouldn't like it, but they'd have a hard time arguing against it. Shawn. _______________________________________________ Ldsoss mailing list Ldsoss@lists.ldsoss.org http://lists.ldsoss.org/mailman/listinfo/ldsoss