Everyone, I ran into a couple of problems recently. I should start work on our packages repository again tomorrow. I apologize for the delay.
I reviewed the previous thread about packages that aren't dependent on a specific glibc. It looks like most people would like us to use "nolibc" for the tree name. Is this the consensus? -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
