On Thu, 2002-06-13 at 09:00, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > > I reviewed the previous thread about packages that aren't dependent on a > > specific glibc. It looks like most people would like us to use "nolibc" > > for the tree name. Is this the consensus? > > Works for me.
Anyone with a dissenting opinion? Other suggestions were: glibc-any, and non-glibc. > Welcome back. I hope the new monitors work out well (and wish I had a > couple myself :) Charles, Thanks. :-) The new SyncMaster 900NF monitors attached to my Matrox G450 should work well, once I'm able to adjust them properly. -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
