> I reviewed the previous thread about packages that aren't dependent on a > specific glibc. It looks like most people would like us to use "nolibc" > for the tree name. Is this the consensus?
Works for me. Welcome back. I hope the new monitors work out well (and wish I had a couple myself :) Charles Steinkuehler http://lrp.steinkuehler.net http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror) _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas - http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm?source=osdntextlink _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
