> > Was this on a RC3 or a RC2 machine? > > If it was on RC3 can somebody of the bering crew confirm that > > something changed in the backupscript the fix the problem I had > > with backing up under RC2. > >Both - but in both cases you have to tell lrcfg.back.initrd the size of >the initrd to make - ie increase INITRD_SIZE from 1500 to 2000. I've >amended the recipe to specifically point that out, but as long as you do >that, both RC2 and RC3 work fine. Judging by the timestamps, I don't >think anything about the backup scripts has changed between RC2 and RC3
I checked the relevant section of the lrcfg.back.script in both and don't see a difference neither. But I did increase my initrd size both in the initrd.lrp & created a larger file according to your procedure. My backup problem just went away the minute I made the modification in lrcfg.back.script that Eric suggested. (See previous mail). So this still leads me to believe that filename does matter one way or another. On the other hand if your package can still be backed up using leaf after you make some changes like adding modules there is probably no reason to change the docs. It is probably even better like this since using initrd.lrp as a filename might make it more confusing. Kim Oppalfens ------------------------------------------------------- Sponsored by: ThinkGeek at http://www.ThinkGeek.com/ _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
