Ray Olszewski wrote: > > At 11:03 AM 2/9/03 -0800, Mike Noyes wrote: > >On Sun, 2003-02-09 at 10:39, Ray Olszewski wrote: > > > It would be easier to develop an (informed) opinion on this if we (or at > > > least I) knew a bit more about what causes you to bring it up as a > > concern. > > > There is a big difference between "some" users and "many" users, since > > > "some" people will be dissatisfied with any approach. > > > >Ray, > >One of our project members sent me a message off-list expressing a > >concern over leaf-user list volume. I have no idea how many of our users > >are affected by the volume on leaf-user. Any enlightenment on this is > >appreciated. > > Glad I asked, since my initial reaction was based on an incorrect guess > about the source of the concern.
Me, too . . . > Asuming the individual involved is the lead person on a branch, I'd very > much recommand providing *that* branch with a separate > leaf-something_or_other list and modifying (a) the SR FAQ and (b) that > branch's main page within LEAF to refer questions there. More generally, > I'd make this decision on a branch-by-branch basis, being guided by the > lead developer's preference. > > Really, it need not be all or nothing here; "fairness" does not enter into > it. <snip /> I second this motion . . . -- Best Regards, mds mds resource 888.250.3987 Dare to fix things before they break . . . Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much we think we know. The more I know, the more I know I don't know . . . ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
