On Mon, 2004-05-17 at 10:43, Martin Hejl wrote:
> Mike Noyes wrote:
> > I'll work on these two suggestions. I guess the information wasn't as
> > redundant as I first though.
>
> Just to throw in my two cents - I agree that it was/is redundant. But I
> also feel that it is not obvious to the casual observer how to get to a
> specific branch without that redundancy.
> If we can make it easier for users to find the information they're
> looking for, I'd say it's very well worth the redundancy.
>
> It's obviously not a big deal for somebody who knows the page, but I'd
> say we should make it as easy as possible for new users to find the
> relevant information (well, either that, or be prepared to answer tons
> of "help, I can't find the packages page anymore" questions).
Martin,
Thank you for the feedback. I'm convinced. I'll rework the Derivation
page back into something that resembles our current Releases/Branches
page.
Everyone,
Any help with navbar readability is welcome. Here is the css it uses:
.navbar, .navbar a:link, .navbar a:visited {
font-size: .9em;
font-variant: small-caps;
font-weight: bold;
text-align: center;
color: #cccccc;
background-color: #333333;
padding: .3em 0em .3em 0em;
}
--
Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net>
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs
-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: SourceForge.net Broadband
Sign-up now for SourceForge Broadband and get the fastest
6.0/768 connection for only $19.95/mo for the first 3 months!
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=2562&alloc_id=6184&op=click
_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
