On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 16:50, Tom Eastep wrote: > Mike Noyes wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 11:13, Ray Olszewski wrote: > > > Aside from some > > > minor cosmetic issues, the main thing here is to make sure we > > > consistently use file extensions for binaries that the Web server > > > identifies as a mime-type that will bring up the SAVE dialog, NOT one > > > that will treat is a text download and thus turn it into jabberwocky.
> > Mime type for .lrp and other binary types can be defined with .htaccess. > > This is the method we use currently. > > If we would just admit that .lrp files are nothing more than stylized > gzip-compressed tar files and change their extension to .tgz, we > wouldn't have this problem. Tom, You're correct. I have no objection to changing the .lrp extension. Of course your suggestion of .tgz is the most compatible. I've considered .ltz in the past (mimicking the Midori package .mlz naming), but this has the same mime issues as .lrp. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: ffl, leaf, phpwebsite, phpwebsite-comm, sitedocs ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings & Training. Attend Black Hat Briefings & Training, Las Vegas July 24-29 - digital self defense, top technical experts, no vendor pitches, unmatched networking opportunities. Visit www.blackhat.com _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
