On Wednesday 05 March 2008 03:18 pm, Mats Erik Andersson wrote:
[...]
>   *) A recursive description may be intellectually pleasing, but
>      is never estetically pleasing, and anyway the borderline
>      to ridicule is not constant among people encountering the
>      particular notion. The need to explain GNU again and again
>      among various authors and writers is a particular bad example!
[...]

We should comply within satisfaction of any GPL'ed code.
But no LEAF variant complies with GNU.
I would not suggest any attempt down the GNU road.
-- 
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Firewall Project developer
http://leaf.sourceforge.net

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to