Hi KP on 18.06.2011 23:50, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > Am Samstag, 18. Juni 2011, 22:51:41 schrieb Erich Titl: >>>>> P.S. Should we store compiled packages into git? Maybe there are more >>>>> useful places for them (file archive/FTP/etc)? Git is more oriented for >>>>> source distribution/versioning... >> >> IMHO we should leave compiled packages out git, at least out of the main >> tree, they are a nuisance there, even though it may brake the current >> release process. > > I'd like to have it in git for at least two reasons: > > Using FRS (and probably other upload methods) is a pain. > The packages page content and the changelog section is created from > buildtoolcfg files the commit logs (of the binaries) - I don't know a way how > this can be done with the binaries lying somewhere in the FRS and the log > files > in git.
I have no clue what FRS stands for, but a versioning system is for things that change, like source, header and config files and, of course, documentation. It is a nuisance that the binaries are a part of the development system and show up in the commit info. One solution might be to put the packages out of the git tree, so no packages directory under buildtool. It should not disturb the underlying make structure or whatever is used to build the packages. cheers Erich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content is compliant with Accessibility Checking. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ephox-dev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
