On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 21:21 +0200, Andrew wrote: > 01.11.2011 20:11, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: > > Am Dienstag, 1. November 2011, 00:06:50 schrieb Andrew: > > > > Not a proposal, just a quick idea: it might be easier longterm to fork > > again from buildroot and adjust it to our needs, instead of hacking a hack > > once more. AFAIK David looked into OPenyoko(?), maybe he'll has something > > to add about his findings... > If somebody can move current infrastructure (.lrp creation, etc) to > other building environment and it'll be enough useful and simple (not > worse than current buildenv) - I haven't any votes against this. In any > case, cleaned/ported packages can be moved to new building system easier.
That would be http://www.yoctoproject.org/ which does look interesting. I did some tests with the 1.0 release and hit some problems but 1.1 is out since October. I will download now and check if the new version works better. The Yocto Project has the backing of The Linux Foundation. There is an overview and Quick Start guide at http://www.yoctoproject.org/docs/current/yocto-project-qs/yocto-project-qs.html It would need to be modified to create .lrp files (rather than .rpm or .deb) and I do not know how difficult that might be. dMb ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA® Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
