Am 26.11.2011 19:40, schrieb Andrew: > 26.11.2011 20:32, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет: >> Hi Andrew; >> >> You've done an oustanding job; thx very much! >> >> I've just updated my machine to ubuntu 11.10 and the pb's I've had (and >> reported) are gone - it's possible to build the packages again on the >> host, without the need for an older VM guest, very convenient. >> >> I'm currently in the process to release rc1 for 4.1.1, so not much time >> and cpu ressources to help you yet... >> >> My roadmap for Bering-uClibc is to have a release of 4.1.1 early next >> month and a 4.2 version with a reviewed kernel (see trac ticket #46) >> early next year. >> >> But hopefully enough time to build and test BuC next during that changes. >> >> Am 26.11.2011 18:37, schrieb Andrew: >>> Hi all. >>> I almost finished packages revision; it seems to be built OK except >>> gnupg (I just didn't ported it), dhcpd (I spent much time for it but I >>> can't force it to be built), libecap (it is needed somewhere?), and I >>> commented some packages that are unneeded/obsolete. >> gnupg is needed, if we add signed packages, so no pb yet, libecap can >> used if we want to enhance squid, but today it is not used. >> >> >>> Now it should be built OK, and I need help in testing - for broken >>> dependencies, new bugs and so on, to be sure that new toolchain is >>> working OK. >> Does tools/buildall.sh work today? >> The last time I tried it failed, cause it did not find a the buildenv >> target (for obvious reason). >> >> To do real world test on a real machine, I will need a geode kernel, the >> last time I looked into BuC next only a i686 kernel has been build. >> >> kp >> >> > I rebuilding all from scratch now and fixing small errors/default > options conflicts that I made in scripts. > I'll finish this today. > > gpg isn't a big trouble - I think i'll port all remain packages in > Monday. Or somebody else will do it faster - if package configure was > built with recent libtoolize/autoconf (newer than 2006-2007 year > release), and if it hasn't dirty ugly hacls like dhcpd has, it's a > trivial task :)
I'm pretty shure the requirements will be met. > I didn't look at buildall.sh; I'll look on it today. Haven't looked into it, but I guess if sources.conf is cleaned, it should work. What about enabling the 486 and geode kernel again? Do you plan to test cross-compiling (and if, when)? It is my understanding that whole work has been done to build the packages for other processors than x86 - am I wrong? kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. IT sense. And common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-novd2d _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
