Looks like it's back online now so no need for any immediate action.

We also have an obligation to provide source code for everything we ship as 
part of each LEAF distribution, in order to comply with the terms of most of 
the open source licenses, and it's *much* easier to do that if we have a copy 
of the source in our own repository. There isn't quite such a strict 
requirement for the buildenv / toolchain since that is not (currently) made 
available in compiled form.

Personally I don't have a problem with us maintaining copies of upstream source 
code in our own repository. It's not a huge volume of data and we've had 
problems with even "reliable" repositories like kernel.org being taken offline 
in the past. IMHO it's better to isolate from such issues. The maintenance 
overhead is not too bad.

david


On 2 Jun 2012, at 16:16, Andrew wrote:

> In any case, keeping everything up-to-date means manual update of 
> package files. Earlier we have sources from 'stable' foreign servers out 
> of tree, but when kernel.org goes down we choose to have all sources in 
> the tree.
> 
> 02.06.2012 18:09, Erich Titl ???????:
>> on 02.06.2012 14:45, Andrew wrote:
>>> In any case, most of the packages are already in repo.
>> True, but questionable
>> 
>> In case of
>>> foreign repo - we need to change paths every time when package is moved
>>> on the server into other place, and in case of server failure/package
>>> deletion we'll have a headache.
>> I guess this is the fate of any system integrator. We have headaches
>> also by the need to keep everything up to date :-)
>> 
>> I just hate redundancy
>> 
>> cheers
>> 
>> Erich


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and 
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions 
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware 
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to