On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Michael D. Schleif wrote:
>
> This must be a common problem ;>
>
> Suppose that there are two (2) Dachstein-CD firewalls masquerading two
> (2) distinct internal networks that happen to use the same private
> subnets (e.g., 192.168.1.0/24).
>
> <http://freeswan.org/freeswan_trees/freeswan-1.91/doc/config.html> is
> pretty emphatic:
>
> ``Note, however, that the two subnets must have distinct addresses. You
> cannot have them both masqueraded to the same range of RFC 1918
> addresses.''
>
> Again, this must be a fairly common problem. As you know, we prefer
> *not* to change any network addressing . . .
Sometimes you don't get what you want.
> What to do if both networks are using same private subnet ???
Don't link them.
> What do you think?
I think you are about to touch the back of your heels with the back of
your head. Stop before you hurt yourself. :)
I also think changing one of the networks is easier than changing both of
them.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeff Newmiller The ..... ..... Go Live...
DCN:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Basics: ##.#. ##.#. Live Go...
Live: OO#.. Dead: OO#.. Playing
Research Engineer (Solar/Batteries O.O#. #.O#. with
/Software/Embedded Controllers) .OO#. .OO#. rocks...2k
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
