Scott,

thank you for the advice.

I read that DachStein was the LRP of choice now.
Not to hot on switching but will if I must.

I spent many hours getting the router to pass my VPN so I can plug in for
work at home.

Got it to work and when I ran one of those external firewall testers it
still showed me as secure.

I did it so long ago I forgot what I did.

I am not looking forward to the work getting Dachstein working also.

Thank you again.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Scott C. Best" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2002 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-user] Message log Overflow crashes EigerStein


> Greg:
> Heya. You got three options to fix this; used to kill me
> too. First, you could upgrade your EigerStein box to a Dachstein
> one. The Dachstein series puts log files on a separate ram-disk
> partition, so even if that disk fills up, the router still works.
>
> That will keep you running, but it won't keep your disk
> from filling. To do *that* you could experiment with the SILENT_DENY
> field in the network.conf file. Since you're on a cable modem
> environment, you're going to see lotsa noise from other people's
> networks, such as the DHCP requests you typed in below.
>
> Lastly, you may want to give echowall.lrp a try. I built
> it on my Eigerstein box on a cable-modem environment, so I was
> very sensitive to minimizing what gets logged and what is, by
> default, silently denied. You can see in the echowall.rules file
> a much more aggressive "don't log this noise" list than what comes
> stock on the Dachstein distribution.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> -Scott
>
> > I am a novice with  linux and the EigerStein router has run flawlessly
for
> > many months on my old 486.
> >
> > The last week My router crashes every 1-2 days and I have to restart it.
> >
> > The message log seems to overflow with  the following:  and 10.38.64.1
is
> > not an IP address assigned by either me or my provider.
> >
> > Any ideas on how to make the EigerStein handle this better?
> >
> > I tried the suggestion on Domain Spaming by Victor form 6/9/2001 (dns
floods
> > port 53) but is seems to have no effect.
> > I have tried changing the port in his solution to both 67 and 68 still
no
> > effect!
> >
> > Any help would be appreciated.  I do not want to have to run out and buy
a
> > router. but don't know what to do.
> >
> > GregO
> >
> > Jan 13 20:05:40 myrouter kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17
> > 10.38.64.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 L=340 S=0x00 I=24287 F=0x0000 T=255
(#9)
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-user mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user


_______________________________________________
Leaf-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user

Reply via email to