Michael D. Schleif wrote:
I am confused ;<

In order to address the original vpn problem, we have setup a pilot vpn
between two (2) of our DCD's.

How does this scenario qualify as ``martian'' ???

root@bluetrout:/root
# tail -f /var/log/kern.log
Nov 11 22:08:09 bluetrout kernel: martian source d233e490 for 9dde0440,
dev wan1
Nov 11 22:09:29 bluetrout last message repeated 2 times
Nov 11 22:09:59 bluetrout last message repeated 2 times
Nov 11 22:11:19 bluetrout last message repeated 2 times
Nov 11 22:13:19 bluetrout kernel: martian source d233e490 for 9dde0440,
dev wan1
Nov 11 22:14:29 bluetrout last message repeated 10 times
Nov 11 22:15:19 bluetrout last message repeated 6 times
Nov 11 22:16:37 bluetrout last message repeated 7 times
Nov 11 22:17:19 bluetrout last message repeated 5 times
Nov 11 22:18:37 bluetrout last message repeated 7 times
Nov 11 22:19:19 bluetrout last message repeated 5 times
Nov 11 22:20:37 bluetrout last message repeated 7 times
Nov 11 22:21:19 bluetrout last message repeated 5 times

NOTE:
	9dde0440 == 64.4.222.157
	d233e490 == 144.228.51.210
	            (wan1 on other side of vpn)


# ip addr
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP> mtu 3924 qdisc noqueue
    link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
    inet 127.0.0.1/8 brd 127.255.255.255 scope global lo
2: ipsec0: <NOARP> mtu 16260 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 10
    link/ipip
    inet 64.4.222.157 peer 64.4.222.158/32 scope global ipsec0
 . . .
7: eth0: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
    link/ether 00:a0:c9:9e:57:70 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 192.168.1.254/24 brd 192.168.1.255 scope global eth0
8: eth1: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
    link/ether 00:a0:c9:9e:64:83 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
    inet 64.4.197.65/26 brd 64.4.197.127 scope global eth1
14: wan1: <POINTOPOINT,NOARP,UP> mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
    link/ppp
    inet 64.4.222.157 peer 64.4.222.158/32 scope global wan1
    inet 64.4.197.99/32 scope global wan1
    inet 64.4.197.100/32 scope global wan1
    inet 64.4.197.101/32 scope global wan1


Every time that I think that I understand what constitutes martian-ness,
I am tossed a new wrinkle ;>

What do you think?
You don't give enough information to correctly diagnose martian errors, which are based pretty much entirely on the status of the route tables. Also, while I have not done a lot of host-host or host-subnet VPNs (you also don't include your IPSec configuration), you will run into problems with these VPN flavors if you don't have rpfiltering turned off (you'll get a warning when starting IPSec about this if it's enabled).

--
Charles Steinkuehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to