On Wed, 2003-01-22 at 09:47, Peter Nosko wrote: > pn] Sorry for the PM Victor. I meant to send it to the list. > > --- Victor McAllister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do not run netmeeting - but this question comes up almost every week. > > pn] Doesn't that indicate that it is high on the list of priorities for LEAF users? > > > M$ uses dynamically assigned ports anywhere in the range 1024:65535 > > for incoming stuff. They designed this without considering firewalls > > and NAT. > > pn] I realize that these distributions are produced by dedicated volunteers and by >no means do I > want to come across as being unappreciative of their efforts. But LEAF and >NetMeeting have been > around for some time now, and it seems that coming up with a solution for this >should get some > lasting attention. Is M$'s design truly solution-proof on LEAF firewalls?
Peter, I'm not sure if this will help, but have you considered using a Gatekeeper? Linux NETMEETING HOWTO http://en.tldp.org/HOWTO/NetMeeting-HOWTO/ OpenH323 Project http://www.openh323.org/ Gateway Protocol Stack http://www.iec.org/online/tutorials/h323/topic06.html OpenH323 Gatekeeper http://www.gnugk.org/ OpenGatekeeper H.323 Proxy http://openh323proxy.sourceforge.net/ Last resort Google string: linux netmeeting firewall -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes @ users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Scholarships for Techies! Can't afford IT training? All 2003 ictp students receive scholarships. Get hands-on training in Microsoft, Cisco, Sun, Linux/UNIX, and more. www.ictp.com/training/sourceforge.asp ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
