On Thu, 2003-01-23 at 16:39, John Mullan wrote: > Well, I looked at the OpenH323 Gatekeeper site and docs. As a > relatively unskilled Linux person, I would say it looks promising. > However, it would likely take me a long time to put it into my current > LEAF configuration even though I do have the space (80Meg DoC and 32Meg > RAM for a 5Meg binary!).
John, I believe the gatekeeper should be run from a machine behind your leaf box. Unfortunately, I don't think the current h323-conntrack-nat Alpha modules support gatekeepers. You may need to use the 2.2.x kernel module instead. This means using a leaf release/branch that is based on kernel 2.2.x. ref. http://www.gnugk.org/h323manual.html # The gatekeeper can sit behind an NAT box and registered by endpoints with public IPs. ref. http://www.netfilter.org/documentation/pomlist/pom-extra.html#h323-conntrack-nat The H.323 conntrack/NAT modules do not support - H.245 tunnelling - H.225 RAS (gatekeepers) > If anyone has or ends up being successful on implementing this on their > LEAF NAT, please let me (and of course the rest of the list) know how > you did it. I second this suggestion. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes @ users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ http://sitedocs.sf.net/ http://ffl.sf.net/ ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
