Homer, Jumping in kinda late here...apologies if I am missing the boat...
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 09:29:21 CST Homer Parker wrote: > On Thu, 30 Jan 2003 11:09:24 +0100 Erich Titl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote.... > > > > Ok... I guess I missed the point that the boxes don't have net > > > > > > access.. > > >There are 7 systems behind the Bering box, and only 2 have net > > >access... > > > > LiveUpdate without net access. It's kind of contradictive. > > > > They are blocked at the firewall at the managements request... But, > they want to keep the virus defs on those machines current, so I'm > trying to find a way to handle that... One way to do that would be to put those machines in their own zone, assign a reject policy from that zone to the net zone, and then add a rule to allow traffic to just the LiveUpdate port(s) on the LiveUpdate servers. --Brad ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
