Should the corp admin's change anything on the firewall to allow for my 
pass-through connection?

I _am_ doing NAT on my end also.  I read on that ipsec.txt that this 
breaks one of the protocols.  What alternatives do I have?

Don.

On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Lynn Avants wrote:

> On Monday 03 February 2003 01:00 am, Don Seiler wrote:
> > That sounds pretty much like what I'm doing now with iptables.  Only I'm
> > assuming in this situation I'd be doing the VPN authentication on the
> > router instead of from the desktop box?  If not then, as I said, I'm
> > already doing this, and not successfully.
> 
> If you are not doing 'pass-through' and want to use a 'gw-to-gw' connection,
> you will _need_ to have your corp admin's change the configuration on 
> their end to account for this or it absolutely will not work. Both sides
> _must_ have the same type of connection configuration for you.
> 
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/guitarlynn/ipsec.txt
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to