Should the corp admin's change anything on the firewall to allow for my pass-through connection?
I _am_ doing NAT on my end also. I read on that ipsec.txt that this breaks one of the protocols. What alternatives do I have? Don. On Mon, 3 Feb 2003, Lynn Avants wrote: > On Monday 03 February 2003 01:00 am, Don Seiler wrote: > > That sounds pretty much like what I'm doing now with iptables. Only I'm > > assuming in this situation I'd be doing the VPN authentication on the > > router instead of from the desktop box? If not then, as I said, I'm > > already doing this, and not successfully. > > If you are not doing 'pass-through' and want to use a 'gw-to-gw' connection, > you will _need_ to have your corp admin's change the configuration on > their end to account for this or it absolutely will not work. Both sides > _must_ have the same type of connection configuration for you. > > http://leaf.sourceforge.net/devel/guitarlynn/ipsec.txt > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html