Since security is a major concern when attached to the Internet, why not make use of the three-interface firewall solution within Bearing/Shorewall and place the wireless access point on that third interface of the firewall within the DMZ? Maybe I'm overlooking a "barn-door" security breach, but it just seems logical to use your wireless devices on "that" interface, and routing traffic accordingly. Anyone else have any thoughts on this?
Regards, Danny Carter On Tue, 11 Feb 2003, Peter Nosko wrote: > > --- Todd Pearsall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The security is fair at best on all of the consumer targeted wireless > > devices I've seen. 128-256bit encryption and some routers will let you > > limit access to pre-defined MAC addresses only (my D-Link doesn't). So > > pn] Hmmm. I found this and think I will remain tethered to cat5e cable > for the time being. > > http://wepcrack.sourceforge.net > > pn] Thanks all for your help! > > ===== > > ----- > Peter Nosko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > This is a good place for a tagline. ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html
