Cal,

> > > I've written Perl scripts to monitor logs in the past. Should just be a
> > > matter of triggering the "rule-mod" event on log content, then getting
> > > the daemon to re-read the rules.
> > >
> > We don't have perl packages for Bering-uClibc....
> 
> Well, that could be a problem then. I'm sure it's still do-able, but it
> might be a little more difficult to implement. I know we're trying to
> keep the footprint as small as possible so it makes sense that the
> rather large Perl distro isn't there. Maybe there's a "mini-perl"
> somewhere. Or, a working Perl script could be converted to C and
> compiled to run by itself.
>
A small footprint is not the only issue, extra software on a 
router/firewall can give higher security risks also.

If I'm not mistaken there is indeed something like "miniperl" I will 
take a look at it.
  
> > You only need to set this flag if you want load-balancing for those 
> > lines. For fallback this isn't necessary, the on-demand link will 
> > have a higher cost set and will only be enabled when the primary link 
> > fails. BGP or OSPF can handle this without problems.
> > You may also take a look at the ipvsadm.lrp package, it will give you 
> > HSRP (Hot Standby Router) like operation 
> > (http://www.linuxvirtualserver.org)
> 
> At peak loads even the 100 Mbps wireless gets saturated for short
> periods. With overhead it's really only about 30-40 Mbps. Load balancing
> with the slower DSL links would still offer some benefit I think. I
> definitely don't see any benefit to balancing with a dial-up link,
> though. Are the links that get balanced selectable? If I enable
> unlimited multipaths, will it try balance all links between identical
> networks?
> 
Equal Cost Multipath is something else than loadbalancing, I wasn't 
fully clear in my previous mail. You probably won't set the costs for 
a 100 Mb and dialup link equal, that means that the router thinks 
those lines are equal in speed and half of the traffic will send over 
the slow link ;-) ECM is only meant for Equal lines.
I have to look at the exact function and impact of the ECM setting.

> I was going to model the entire project on VMware, but I found that
> VMware limits number of NICs to 3, too few for most of my routers. I
> suppose I can still model some of this functionality though, to get the
> feel of the software. It will also help answer some of the "dumb"
> questions without cluttering the mailing list.
> 
> Thank you for the follow-up.
> 
> --Cal Webster
> 
> 
> 
> 




-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials
Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of
GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system
administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
SR FAQ: http://leaf-project.org/pub/doc/docmanager/docid_1891.html

Reply via email to