Hello Ronny, I'm curious about an openswan - openswan throughput, the differences could be in the combination freeswan - openswan due to implementation differences like pointed out by Arne and Erich. I'm glad that 2.4.5 is at least better than 2.4.4.
Eric > >> Hello Ronny, Cedric, >> >> >> I did update the package and kernel module yesterday (but the package >> page is not updated yet). The location is: >> >> http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/bin/packages/uclibc-0.9/20/ >> for the package, and: >> http://leaf.cvs.sourceforge.net/leaf/bin/bering-uclibc/packages/ >> for the kernel tarball with the new ipsec module. > > thanks to both of you for providing openswan 2.4.5 the good news is that > it's better then openswan 2.4.4, but still a bit slower then freeswan. > > > new openswan 2.4.5 test thru the tunnel [local > ws]---[openswan]===(internett)===[freeswan]----[remote-ws] [ 3] 0.0-10.0 > sec 7.37 MBytes 6.18 Mbits/sec [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 7.38 MBytes 6.16 > Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 7.31 MBytes 6.13 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 7.32 MBytes 6.14 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 7.37 MBytes 6.18 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 7.38 MBytes 6.18 Mbits/sec > > > new openswan router test outside tunnel using dnat rule on remote router. > varies a bit becouse of the remote usage and wireless [local > ws]---[openswan_masq]---(internett)---[fw-DNAT]--[remote ws] [ 3] > 0.0-10.0 sec 10.1 MBytes 8.45 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.39 MBytes 7.88 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.40 MBytes 7.86 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.70 MBytes 8.13 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.70 MBytes 8.12 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.74 MBytes 8.16 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.45 MBytes 7.93 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.46 MBytes 7.92 Mbits/sec > > > > this is my old setup freeswan vs freeswan [local > ws]---[freeswan]===(internett)===[freeswan]----[remote-ws] [ 3] 0.0-10.0 > sec 8.30 MBytes 6.96 Mbits/sec [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 8.59 MBytes 7.20 > Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 8.57 MBytes 7.18 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 8.72 MBytes 7.28 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 8.60 MBytes 7.21 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.1 sec 7.56 MBytes 6.30 Mbits/sec > > > test outside of the tunnel using the old freeswan router [local > ws]---[freeswan_masq]---(internett)---[fw-DNAT]--[remote ws] [ 3] > 0.0-10.0 sec 9.32 MBytes 7.82 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.33 MBytes 7.81 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.12 MBytes 7.65 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.13 MBytes 7.64 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0- 5.7 sec 5.34 MBytes 7.84 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.48 MBytes 7.95 Mbits/sec > [ 3] 0.0-10.0 sec 9.48 MBytes 7.96 Mbits/sec > > > > my thougths 1. the main limit is the remote site's wireless internet > conenctions, the local site have a 100mbit lan to the internett, same isp > 2. the new router have a better truput outside of the tunnel, then old. > 3. openswan have about ~1 mbit less thruput then freeswan. > 4. but 2.4.5 seams better then 2.4.4 that had ~4-5 in truput. > > > > Ronny > > > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job > easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache > Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > leaf-user mailing list: [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user > Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/ > > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ leaf-user mailing list: [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
