Martin
Martin Hejl schrieb:
> Kwon wrote:
...
>
> If somebody supplies a patch to fix things, it will be applied (I'm
> rather sure about that - if nobody else will do it, I'll apply the
> patch). If not, somebody will look at it when he/she has extra time
> (there's no telling when that might be - mail is not one of the core
> features of a leaf box, so mail being broken isn't a show-stopper in my
> book).
I just patched mine this afternoon, at least in my case it was the
source function which appears to be a bad function name for current busybox.
A patch can either be to remove the source function, renaming it with
another name or lift the restriction on the shell.
here is my patch
--- mail.old Sun Aug 13 21:18:10 2006
+++ mail Fri Aug 24 22:38:52 2007
@@ -3,7 +3,6 @@
#GPL2 -- Dave Cinege <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#
-source () { . $@ ; }
qt () { "$@" >/dev/null 2>&1 ; }
eecho () { echo "$@" >/dev/null >&2 ; }
prog=${0##*/}
@@ -14,7 +13,7 @@
'
MASTCONF="/etc/POSIXness.conf"
-[ -f "$MASTCONF" ] && source $MASTCONF
+[ -f "$MASTCONF" ] && . $MASTCONF
usage () {
cheers
Erich
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc.
Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop.
Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser.
Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
leaf-user mailing list: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-user
Support Request -- http://leaf-project.org/
