David, Thanks for the info. I'll go ahead and try out 1.3 for testing only.
Mike David A. Bandel wrote: > On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 10:07, Michael Chinn<[email protected]> wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I've noticed that there are some LSMB users now migrating to 1.3 (from > > they are? > >> 1.2). Is 1.3 for testing only? > > pretty much > >> I noticed that 1.3 is now on "milestone 3". At what milestone (7? 8? >> 9?) will 1.3 be considered production level? >> >> I have a client with a 1.2.18 install but with only about 2-dozen >> entries. I could easily have those reentered into 1.3 if 1.3 is >> considered stable enough. >> > > Do you not like this client? Have you tried the software from an svn > checkout? > > Think of it like this: Chris and crew are building a car -- from > scratch, pretty much. There's a chassis, wheels and tires, and an > engine. No body, do doors. You'll need a box to sit at the steering > wheel. Yeah, you can make it go (and some may), but ... do you want > to yet? > > For production (clients), you always want to stick to tried and true, > in this case 1.2.18. Let testers and early adopters find (and > hopefully iron out) the kinks (or join them if you dare -- you're most > welcome to join the -developers list). Folks on this list (-users) > will be the first to know when 1.3.x is considered "stable" (i.e., > most stuff works most of the time and someone will likely help when > something doesn't work for you). > > Remember: The only guarantee you'll get with GPL software is if it > breaks, you get to keep both pieces. > > Ciao, > > David A. Bandel -- ====================== Michael Chinn [email protected] Office: +1.510.931.6170 Mob: +1.510.908.3015 Fax: +1.510.619.8438 Skype: mchinnp2f ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
