On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:50 +0500, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > Hi Luis, I can understand your position but here are few other issues: > > 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so) > 2. LedgerSMB 1.3 (a quite different db structure) is not in > production > yet and we don't have any time estimate when it will be. > 3. LedgerSMB 2.0 (an entirely different beast) development has been > started.
Thanks for the info! So, to be clear, are you telling me that the project is deliberately setting up the release dates to leave users without a "stable" version for an unspecified amount of time? We're used to provide our own support for everything we use, which is why the innards are an important factor. Best regards. -lem ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
