On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 20:01 +0500, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > Absolutely not. Chris has worked really hard and also provides > extensive/free support on this mailing list which is as good as any > commercial support or even better. And we are all really grateful to > him > (and other contributors as well) (and I have not yet contributed any > thing to the project)
Ah, I understand. > I think things are bit out of hand. I think 1.3's complexity has > caused > all the delay. And now we are talking about 2.0 as well. Now as far as > I > am concerned, I shall not migrate to 1.3 for a short period of time if > I > know that soon 2.0 is going to be released. Not sure what you or > others > will do. > > I started evaluating 1.3 earlier this year but stopped after getting > so > many installation issues. Finally I have decided that there is no harm > to use LSMB 1.2 for new customers (who are asking for LSMB) instead of > waiting for 1.3 release. But I am not moving customers from SL to LSMB > with many years of data. Perhaps people staying at 1.2 longer will provide the required support. Best regards. -lem ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
