On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: > Luke wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Apr 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: >> >>> 1. LedgerSMB 1.2 support will discontinue soon. (In a year or so) >>> >> Did Chris actually say that? > Yes. I asked that question on the list. I don't remember exactly (quick > archives search could not get me that email) but he said something like > it will be supported as long as Postgresql 8.3 is supported (which is > about 6-12 months). The problems might arise with new Linux
Ah, now I remember. Perhaps by the end of that discussion i did not take it as such a hard conclusion as you did--it would be difficult to discontinue the bulk of support if most users did not migrate to 1.3; and if most do migrate to 1.3 once it is stable, the problems you expect will probably be minimized, as a good upgrade path will exist. As for 2.0, I believe it's on hold until 1.3 is officially released, so that it will not be developed and supported concurrently with the other two versions, which would be a nightmare. Luke ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Ledger-smb-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
