Obviously if it were shown that we were paying conspicuously less than clubs smaller and with smaller turnover, then he would feel pressured to bridge the gap. I'm talking at least the middle of the bell curve. He could convincingly justify not over spending in those circumstances. Not too difficult a concept to grasp, surely?
Sent from my iPhone On 28 Jul 2011, at 22:06, markbu...@aol.com wrote: > >>> It would put pressure on him to pay the going rate.<< > > > > > > > > Define "the going rate". Leicester City's current going rate, or Norwich's > going rate last season? > > I'm sure Ridsdale thought he was paying "the going rate" for Seth Johnson. > > I'm just trying to get my head round how you view a rule designed to > encourage financial prudence in football. Using it as a way of embarrassing a > > club chairman to spend more money! > > Insane! > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it) > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
