I suppose Ted I should have said "with not many shots..." I did mention the
'goal' the one on one plus the shots from Saiz and Phillips and the cross from
Dallas - but that is not much to show for 90minutes at home
I am still confident and thought it was a decent enough game - much better than
Saturday- with both teams trying to play nice football.
From: Ted <tedhea...@gmail.com>
To: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
Cc: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
Sent: Wednesday, 16 August 2017, 7:58
Subject: Re: [LU] Fulham
Dave wrote:
....fans saw us pass the ball around a bit but have no shots or chances worthy
of the name.
And the Doctor wrote:An awful match. Nothing positive to say.
If Cellimo was here, our coach would be sacked.
A truly abysmal game followimg a lousy one on Saturday
Sorry but I've got to disagree slightly Dave - I usually agree fully with your
reports but what about Wood's one-on-one miss? And his "goal" was apparently
on-side. Plus Aylings shot that went just wide and Dallas' shot/pass that got
deflected at the death, just to go agonisingly past the reach of Wood.For a
nil-nil, I thought it was a pretty good game - both teams could have pinched it
and after the first 20 minutes (where we didn't get a look in) we seemed to
play okay - I thought we looked pretty dangerous on the attack. Siaz was
everywhere, Alionski gave them trouble and Shaunesseey looked pretty assured
for a newbie - his latch ditch tackle at the end was a match winning tackle.If
we play with that tempo against most teams in this division, we'll beat most.
As for the Doctor's comments, WTF? Were you watching the same game as us?
Ted H
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
FLAME WARS 'R US
