My understanding is that the licensing arrangements (or lack thereof)
allow them to offer this to overseas fans.
As for being an overseas fan, simple fact is that my local team did
not exist when I first discovered Leeds. So yeah, I should support
that club more, but Leeds is still #1 to me.
Finally, I would move to England in a heartbeat, but unfortunately the
UK government does not accept "be closer to Leeds United" as a valid
reason to let me live there.
Sent from my iPad
> On Aug 16, 2017, at 7:09 AM, {broken-address} Richard Walker
> <richleed...@yahoo.co.uk.is-broken.gn.apc.org> wrote:
>
> So why is this only available to overseas fans ?
> I imagine the assumption is that they can't get to away games (and home
> games). Well, having tried to get a ticket for an away game this season I
> realised I didn't have a cat in hells chance given my part-time (almost
> non-time) attendance at away games last season. So I will end up listening on
> Radio Leeds whilst Tony from Sydey as a front row seat for £5.
> Overseas fans might say if they lived in the UK they would attend all games.
> So why did overseas fans go abroad anyway ? Can't have loved their footy that
> match ?
> Or in the case of overseas fans born in other countries , why do they
> support Leeds instead of their local team ?
> Not sure whether they deserve this privilege ?
>
>
> From: Nigel Sykes <ni...@sykesonline.com>
> To: 'Leeds List' <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 August 2017, 13:55
> Subject: Re: [LU] Fulham
>
> It's on the main website, in the LUTV section
> (https://www.leedsunited.com/lutv). You have to register and then when you
> go back to the site and login, you select "Match Centre" at the very top,
> then "International Match Centre" on the middle-right of the screen that
> appears (nobody says they made it easy!). Then the live link appears (when
> there is a game to watch, naturally). It being Leeds, when you click the
> play icon, all it does it being up another play icon, in a different
> colour(!), but if you persevere, it finally plays.
>
> Nigel
> (the Dublin one)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Naef [mailto:rich...@triumph-computers.co.uk]
> Sent: 16 August 2017 13:02
> To: Nigel Sykes; 'Leeds List'
> Subject: RE: [LU] Fulham
>
> Hi Nigel,
>
> Have you got a link, I'd like to give it a go (I have IPVanish)
>
> ttfn
>
> Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of Nigel Sykes
> Sent: 16 August 2017 12:37
> To: 'Leeds List' <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Subject: Re: [LU] Fulham
>
> The new scheme allows you to watch any non-televised game, home and away, for
> 5 quid a time (actually, you get 3 days access for your fiver).
>
>
> I’m currently in France, so haven’t had to flaunt any rules. But I heard of
> someone who was watching yesterday’s game in London. I’m guessing that they
> will do an IP address check to block UK and Ireland IP’s, so you would
> probably need a VPN (there are many available. e.g. TunnelBear, IPVanish
> etc.) to spoof your IP to somewhere abroad, if you are in the UK or Ireland.
>
> The sign-up asks you which country you are in, but doesn’t ask for an address
> (it did ask for a telephone number, and I have a French one anyway, but that
> probably isn’t significant). I paid through a PayPal account registered to
> an Irish address, and that wasn’t a problem.
>
> Nigel
> (the Dublin one)
>
>
>
> From: Richard Walker [mailto:richleed...@yahoo.co.uk]
> Sent: 16 August 2017 12:15
> To: Nigel Sykes; 'Leeds List'
> Subject: Re: [LU] Fulham
>
>
>
> does the new arrangement allow you to watch all away games i.e non-sky away
> games ?
>
>
>
> and if so, is there a way of getting around the fact that you're not outside
> the UK to be able to access ?
>
>
>
> _____
>
> From: Nigel Sykes <ni...@sykesonline.com>
> To: 'Leeds List' <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 August 2017, 11:49
> Subject: Re: [LU] Fulham
>
>
>
> Have watched every game so far (I'm loving this new ability to watch them
> live, if you're outside the UK & Ireland!). Thought Shaughnessey looked okay
> defensively, but I agree with Verner in that he looks lacking in the passing
> department. It's like Philips - everyone goes on about his work rate and the
> number of tackles he makes - which is all great, of course - but his
> distribution is woeful. Having said all that, you need ball winners, and if
> we haven't got ball winners who can also pass the ball in Batty-esque
> fashion, then we still need these guys.
>
> My biggest rant has consistently been about Roofe. I cannot understand how
> he gets a game.
>
> But the biggest take-away so far is that we need time and a more consistent
> team selection, to give them a chance to get used to each other more. At the
> end of the day, I'm happier with what I've seen so far than I have been in
> years.
>
> Nigel
> (the Dublin one)
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Leedslist [mailto:leedslist-boun...@gn.apc.org] On Behalf Of
> nat...@sky.com
> Sent: 16 August 2017 11:14
> To: Leeds List
> Subject: Re: [LU] Fulham
>
> It is all about opinions BUT in addition to Phil Hay I would refer you to
> Teds comments "Shaunesseey looked pretty assured for a newbie - his latch
> ditch tackle at the end was a match winning tackle."
> and this from Moscow white of the square Ball - " And overall Shaughnessy
> looked calm, composed and competent to an almost ludicrous degree" so clearly
> I was not alone in my assessment of him and I stand by what I said.
> It has been difficult at the back with two left backs (Berardi and CBJ) and
> two centre halves (Pennington & Cooper) getting injured and having to miss
> games. We have started all 4 games so far with different line-ups, some
> having a player out of position (Anita and ayling) Bolton - Ayling, Cooper,
> Pennington Berardi, Port Vale - Anita Ayling Shaughnessey
> Borthwick-JacksonPreston - Ayling Jansson Cooper Borthwick- JacksonFulham -
> Ayling, Jansson Shaughnessey Anita Dave
>
>
> From: Errand Fivefold <errand.fivef...@talk21.com>
> To: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>; Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 August 2017, 9:30
> Subject: Re: [LU] Fulham
>
> Shaughnessey? Unless both Allard and I were in a parrallel universe and not
> at the match last night, Shaughnessey couldn't pass a ball!!!!!!
> Verner tHe LiTtLe YeLlOw DaFfOdIl @}-,-'--
>
> From: "nat...@sky.com" <nat...@sky.com>
> To: Leeds List <leedslist@gn.apc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, 16 August 2017, 7:00
> Subject: Re: [LU] Fulham
>
> Well we were promised goals, entertaining football and a side that would have
> a philosophy of 'we will score more than you' - not really working out like
> that as we have now gone 3 hours at home without a goal and with barely a
> shot on target Although the result was the same as Saturday the game itsef
> was very different as Fulham tried to play football rather than just stopping
> us playing , and indeed they succeeded for much of the time. The first 25
> minutes they pinged it about and we looked second best. Phillips in
> particular having a torrid time of it, then he made on good tackle which
> raised his confidence and he looked a different player, getting stuck in and
> moving the ball well. The team as a whole got a lift from this and the match
> was more even.
> Both teams however had a real lack of a cutting edge up front so all the
> fancy dan stuff went with no reward. We had only one shot on target (apart
> from Wood's offside 'goal') - a ball was played through to Wood and since he
> was a lot closer to goal this time, I did think he may score, but no, he
> tried , not very well, to chip the keeper and made it an easy save Second
> half Phillips had a shot from range that fizzed past, Hernandez had a awful
> freekick from a brilliant position , and Siaz pulled a shot just wide. Fulham
> were as blunt as us and I can only recall Wiedwald making one save when he
> came rushing out at the feet of the striker - good action from him. Fulham
> aslo hit the post. Perhaps the closest we came was a great cross from Dallas
> that just missed the outstretched foot of Wood So after 32k on saturday over
> 28K (great for an ordinary midweek league game for us) fans saw us pass the
> ball around a bit but have no shots or chances worthy of the name. Things
> will need to improve. Fulham will be up there at the end of the season, so a
> draw could be a creditable result, having said that 2 pts from 2 home games
> is not good enough and puts us under pressure to get all 3 pts at Sunderland
> Some general observations - Shaunnessey is looking like a real find, he is
> growing in confidence and may soon be giving TC a real selection headache.
> Anita is a tidy player and good at this level, but not a left back. Saiz is
> looking like the real deal - needs to cut out the moaning, diving, showing
> imaginary cards and needs to be a bit stronger but I do have faith in him.
> Alioski is the opposite so far he shows the odd flash of brilliance and does
> have a good work ethic but I think he is finding it faster and more committed
> than he expected - maybe leave him on the bench for a while ?
> THe keeper still does not fill me with confidence but it is clear what the
> plan is with him throwing it out, almost all the time, and generally very
> quickly - the defenders (and this is the 4th different back four in his 4
> games) need to get in tune with him and him them.
> Pontus - did not notice him at all - not sure if this is good or bad. There
> was one great Pontus-style last minute tackle in the box last nigh, but that
> was by Shaughnessey !
> We need to be patient - it is better than this time last season - and we need
> Wood to start scoring or Ekuban to get a run late on to help him out Dave
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>
>
> FLAME WARS 'R US
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>
>
> FLAME WARS 'R US
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>
>
> FLAME WARS 'R US
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>
>
> FLAME WARS 'R US
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>
>
> FLAME WARS 'R US
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
>
>
> FLAME WARS 'R US
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: https://mailman.gn.apc.org/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email leedslist-unsubscr...@gn.apc.org
FLAME WARS 'R US
