----- Original Message ----- > "The result was 75.02% in Bates' favour. However, the ballot papers we > were given rounded the value of debt down to the nearest £1000 to ease the > voting process. So for all 20 year ST holders, we were given £3000 of > voting > power,> even though for some the debt was much more. Likewise, small > traders had their votes rounded down too.
I saw a 20yr ST proxy form this morning which had been "rounded down" from £3,956 to £3,000. By any standards that is stretching the concept of rounding too far. It should by any fair method have been rounded up to £4,000. >Why were the 20 year ST holders and for that matter any other FOOTBALL DEBTORS allowed a vote? 20 yr ST holders are NOT football creditors. >... and therefore are not owed anything, they don't have to accept the penny in the pound pittance as their debt is secure! They very much ARE owed something as at today. >A lot of these voters will be anti Bates (Particularly the likes of Rick who has a sort of conflict of interest here, so sureley they should be taken them out the equation What possible conflict of interest are you talking about ? Secondly, why should those who might be against Bates for whatever reason be taken out of the equation ? _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
