So what isnt true? That Healy didnt defer his wages? I dont think somehow that Bates would say that publicly if it werent the case.
But you clearly know the man better than I do. I will await Healy's agent's statement on the matter calling Bates a liar. But I won't be holding my breath. -----Original Message----- From: Sean Emmott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 05 June 2007 10:05 To: Mark Humphries Cc: [email protected] Subject: Re: [LU] Wage deferrals - Healy + who? On Tue, June 5, 2007 9:09 am, Mark Humphries wrote: > It appears that Healy was one of the two players who refused to defer > their wages, and as a result won't play for Leeds again. > > Any ideas who the other was? > > > An interesting comment by Bates though, it sort of implies that him > staying may have been an option otherwise, which also suggests the wages > of at least some of the top players might be sustainable in league one. Yeah, because obviously if Bates says it, it must be true. I'd have thought it's quite obvious: Healy knows he's out the door (Poyet said as much the day after we were relegated) regardless of anything else: we can get £1m for him at least and we still need to raise money. Bates has a well established track record of slagging off players, directors and staff that leave Leeds. He was never going to sell Kilgallon because he was "the next John Terry". I know you think Bates is the way forward, but don't try and read anything into what he says: you can tell when he's lying because his lips are moving. - Sean _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
