On Tue, June 5, 2007 2:30 pm, Mark Humphries wrote: > I am (and was) going by an article I read stating there were 3 possible > outcomes, the second one being a close vote and someone challenging. I > don't know if this 28 day clause has kicked in automatically because the > vote was close or if it would have been the case regardless? Or maybe > someone has requested time to consider a legal challenge?
I don't know that either. > In other words I don't know if the result on Monday was option 1, Bates > wins and the club can get on with business (and this 28 days period is a > formality and not taken into account by the football league), or option 2 > because the result was close and someone has requested the time to > consider. > > I personally don't think the football league could stop us trading from > tomorrow unless a challenge has actually been issued. Don't we need an FL licence? > But hey, this all makes a change from stories of Kelly being nobbled by > men with baseball bats or Duberry's food being spiked. Ok, OK, Bates before Morris, I'll give you that one :-) > Something as heinous as that must have been dreamt up by Bates surely? bet you he wishes he'd thought of it first ;-) - Sean _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
