----- Original Message ----- 
Subject: Re: [LU] Statement on the club site regarding the potential appeal

> Again, interestingly no-one has mentioned the anti vote that worked
> exactly the same way as the Yorkshire Radio vote, propogandonists of
> the  world unite eh?

Speaking for myself, the reason that I could not mention it is because I 
openly admit right here that I don't know anything about any anti-vote that 
worked in exactly the same way as Yorkshire Radio vote. You seem to know 
sufficient about it to post it on here so I would be grateful if you could 
let us have the deatils of it and explain how it worked in the same way.
Hopefully you know what you are talking about as you rely on it heavily 
(below). I would very much like to include your information in my own 
balanced view.

>That's an excellent point Tim, and precisely the kind of thing I had issues
with when the 'news', or quasi inside information, was being posted to the
list previously.

Hopefully we can all agree with your mutual back-scratching once you have 
explained what the point actually is. I'm really and honestly looking 
forward to reading the explanation..

>I am not naive enough to think the Bates stuff didn't have a hefty dose of
spin, but my refusal to believe the anti-crowds posts weren't telling us the
whole truth has been vindicated (for me personally).

Please, please let us have the explanation so that we can agree with your 
vindication. What is this lack of truth that you talk about ? Share your 
revelation and that way we may be all able to agree with you.


_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. 
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org 

Reply via email to