Yup you're right...I'm the one, or at least one of the ones who don't get it...not surprising really,
Especially, the way you continue to re-write history...and pull stuff out of thin air. One moment you were "being passionate," and "finding it hard not to swear" about your position, then next you are merely, "playing devil's advocate" (isn't that supposed to be a detached and non-passionate position?) For many emails you have, vehemently supported Bates' actions, as long as it gets us an unencumbered pre-season and sod anyone who gets hurt in the process or the damage it may do to the club's reputation and future. Now you'd have us believe you weren't pro Bates, just being "anti-anti bates" and then, within the next sentence not, "anti-bates per se." You do seem to be a little confused, all around, so no wonder we don't / can't get it. Finally why and where do you get, the snide comment regarding the Trust and their "support the Redbus bid?" Where in the LUST statement did you read, or get a clue to that? I would suggest you work on the confusion, regarding your own position, before trying to analyse hidden meanings or motives in other people's statements. That way we all might get it. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
