----- Original Message ----- >>>That is why the exceptional circumstances clause had to be stopped at >>>all > costs and I strongly suspect that it was stopped (at all costs)>
> But surely Bates now needs the exceptional circumstances clause in order > to > get the golden share? Is there any other way out without a CVA? Yes exactly. He faced total loss or living to fight another day no matter what problems it may cause. It would explain the obvious exasperation diplayed by KPMG and their -good luck with getting your share back -statement. It also explains the FL statements which left a get-out so long as the club did not submit paperwork proving that we were no longer in administration. So in order for the current owners to live to fight on, the club is now in a dilemma where we cannot on the face of it meet either of the two criteria for the GS. No wonder it has all gone quiet and the FL are taking legal advice. Can I prove it - no. Alternatively, many would have us believe that the mean and nasty FL don't want to give the GS back to Leeds because they hate us. The FL were the ones who brought up exceptional circumstances in the first place. Why mention it at all ? Something stopped them. _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Join The Leeds United Supporters Trust at www.lufctrust.org
