Drug goggles ????? Surely not ?
--- On Sun, 22/2/09, DAVID NATTAN <[email protected]> wrote: > From: DAVID NATTAN <[email protected]> > Subject: [LU] Cheltenham > To: "list leedslist" <[email protected]> > Date: Sunday, 22 February, 2009, 12:02 PM > Don’t disagree with anything Rich W has said really. This > was just too easy – they were as poor a team as have ever > set foot in Elland Road.. My comments about Huddersfield > last week giving more than 100% seemed to be born out with > their Cup Final victory being followed by a defeat – > Hereford after their memorable victory over us also did a > Walsall and managed to lose their next game – it just > shows how much effort physical and mental they put into > games against us ! At least Cheltenham did not seem able to > do the same. Grayson seemed (like me) to have lost faith in > Trundle and I cannot see his loan being extended again, and > let Snodgrass play up front –often in a three with Becchio > and Robinson. All three of them did well and worked hard and > all should and could have got on the score sheet hitting the > woodwork a few times between them. Howson kept his place and > this worked both for him – showing the form of last season > and for Delph who was > shifted to the left where he did not have to do everything > himself. In fact that is one thing I do disagree with Rich > on – I am fairly sure it was a superb ball by Delph not > Becchio that let Howson get across the defender and slot in > his second (like Rich I was watching through beer \ drug > goggles). Howsons first was good too – a lovely cross from > Robbo was met outside the 6 yd box by the leaping Howson who > glanced it with power into the net. > We basically walked this game and they were so poor they > never put us under any pressure this meant that neither of > the stand in right backs – Hughes and Douglas were tested, > and nor was Parker (now once again ahead of Sheehan in the > pecking order) tested defensively and as we know that is his > weakness. Also their total lack of quality and commitment > meant that Kilkenny was able to stroll around the park > pulling the strings – his best game since his debut v > Northampton – can he do it week in week out in this > midfield though. > So a comfortable win – the 4th in a row at ER – a clean > sheet and two goals without Beckford ( we did feel, > especially at 0 0 at half time, that he would have had a > hatful if he had been playing) > We have two much tougher games coming up against Scunthorpe > and Oldham (will the 2 scunny lads sent off yesterday be > banned ?) – and these games will go a long way to > determining our season. Grayson will have decisions to make > – who makes way for Beckford ? Has Kilkenny done enough to > keep his place ? Who will be right back ? (there is paper > talk of getting someone in on loan from Pompey) > But back to winning ways and an enjoyable day out – good > crowd considering and they gave the team support even when > it was not quite working – I was expecting a few boos at > half time but did not hear any > Dave > On a different note I have just read on local teletext that > the police have apologised to Everton fans for changing the > time \ day of one of their games due to a BNP rally – > funny how they never apologise when they alter our kick > off details !! > _______________________________________________ > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list > administrators accept no liability for the personal views > and opinions of contributors. > Leedslist mailing list > [email protected] > http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > Sorry Macca - it's the curse of Bates old lad _______________________________________________ the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. Leedslist mailing list [email protected] http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist Sorry Macca - it's the curse of Bates old lad
