Section 5 should be used in cases which amount to less serious incidents of 
anti-social behaviour. Where violence has been used, it is not normally 
appropriate to charge an offence under section 5 unless the physical behaviour 
amounts merely to pushing or undirected lashing out of a type likely to cause 
no more than a glancing blow, minor bruising or grazing. Such conduct may also 
be classified as disorderly and suitable for a charge under section 91 CJA 1967 
in appropriate circumstances.
There must be a person within the sight or hearing of the suspect who is likely 
to be caused harassment, alarm or distress by the conduct in question. A police 
officer may be such a person, but remember that this is a question of fact to 
be decided in each case by the magistrates. In determining this, the 
magistrates may take into account the familiarity which police officers have 
with the words and conduct typically seen in incidents of disorderly conduct. 
(DPP v Orum [1988] Crim LR 848)
Although the existence of a person who is caused harassment alarm and distress 
must be proved, there is no requirement that they actually give evidence. In 
appropriate cases, the offence may be proved on a police officer's evidence 
alone.
Police officers are aware of the difficult balance to be struck in dealing with 
those whose behaviour may be perceived by some as exuberant high spirits but by 
others as disorderly. In such cases informal methods of disposal may be 
appropriate and effective; but if this approach fails and the disorderly 
conduct continues then criminal proceedings may be necessary.
In deciding whether a charge under section 5 is appropriate, the nature of the 
conduct must be considered in light of the penalty that the suspect is likely 
to receive on conviction.


 
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Sorry Macca - it's the curse of Bates old lad

Reply via email to