3.3 and you have a deal, I would have gone to 3.5 but for that stupid tackle
(nobody has mentioned that yet) that earned him a well deserved booking.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "stotty" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:48 AM
To: "Chris Briggs" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>;
<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LU] Oldham
ok - can we bump it to 3.5?
he is a local lad after all.
all happy with that?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Briggs" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "stotty"
<[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 10:16 AM
Subject: Re: [LU] Oldham
woah, hang on a sec. He was that bad and I think that 3 is an accurate
reflection, running around and working hard is no good whatsoever if your
final pass goes astray or you get dispossessed. End of!.
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Richard Walker" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 9:59 AM
To: <[email protected]>; "stotty" <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LU] Oldham
I suppose 3 for Delph was harsh and I am judging him by his high
standards. I was surprised how many times he lost possession too easily.
--- On Tue, 3/3/09, stotty <[email protected]> wrote:
From: stotty <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [LU] Oldham
To: [email protected], [email protected]
Date: Tuesday, 3 March, 2009, 9:34 AM
Pretty much agree with those all numbers - Johnson and
Parker are woeful.
Delph I thought worked very, very hard and 3/10 is harsh.
By his standards he passing was poor but he wasn't THAT
bad ;-)
Douglas looked decent but that came from a team effort to
close people down quickly and deny Oldham space. All the
midfield did a good job at that except Johnson who actually
seemed to think it was funny that he was playing so shit.
Couple of loan signings and I think we'll go up!
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Sorry Macca - it's the curse of Bates old lad
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Sorry Macca - it's the curse of Bates old lad
_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors.
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
Sorry Macca - it's the curse of Bates old lad
