Loran,

You bring up the key point... ie, the need of most systems for "either cross-referencing or duplicating when we have one group of people (such as in a group photo or in a census family)", which is why I use the file it as I got it system which files sources once but is referenced by all that use it. When I find a census record I print it out and file it with the next number available sequencially (starting with 0001) in my binders and record that number in the FILE ID on the source detail screen in Legacy. Then when I'm asked a question about a source it takes me seconds to find it by going to that person in my database and checking the source for the ID number. Each person in the census gets this same source with the same FILE ID #, BUT IT IS FILED ONCE. After reading Bob's post, now I'm going to scan everything or retrieve it from the web in a photo format and preserve them on cd's also, using the FILE ID # as the name of the photo.

I am also a firm believer in keeping one database because I find that we are all related. It didn't take that long for me to find that my husband's line connects to my birth family's line and my birth family's line connects to my adoptive family's line ( I love saying I'm related to myself). The idea of putting these lines in twice was not acceptable.
Jean

----- Original Message ----- From: "Loran Braught" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "LegacyUserGroup" <LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 11:55 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One tested method of organizing files ...a bit more


Frankly I will not endeavor to defend the standard ahnentafel nor the library cross referencing systems that have survived virtually all options for many decades.

I am not a professional genealogist, but I have noticed that the more we try to merge family lines into one file the more difficulties we create for ourselves in organizing the data. For sure it is much easier to merge family lines than separate them and for sure merging family lines will deeply challenge organizing the data.

I do not see how to avoid the choice of either cross-referencing or duplicating when we have one group of people (such as in a group photo or in a census family).

My personally chosen method is to create separate pedigree lines for each grandparent surname and use the same ahnentafel system for each. This would appear somewhat like the soundex pattern with each surname preceding systematic numbering. This pattern can be extended to as many surname lines as you pick, but I can not handle documentation tasks for more than four families much farther than about five generations. Good luck to those who think that they can.

The major strength of the ahnentafel organization is that every one not only has a unique number, but that number simultaneously identifies the family relationship of the preferred direct family line. Those not in that direct line with ahnentafel identification can simply continue using the RIN/MRIN system that has basis only for the random entry sequence.

Incidentally, if we add a sibling who belonged inside a chronological order, the only ahnentafel numbers that need to be re-sorted and renumbered are those of that one family (no big task).

As someone remarked, no one is obligated to use any organizational system and folks are entitled to keep their data in piles instead of files. I merely have watched the ahnentafel system work much smoother than other options I have observed and decided to share the idea in case folks want to analyze or test the comparisons.

If anyone wants to discuss this with me further, please contact me directly as I really do not want to clutter this message board with perpetual clarifications or debate on this one issue.

Respectfully,

Loran Ralph Braught
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(812) 535-3618
8380 N. Crestwood Pl
West Terre Haute, IN 47885

Researching mostly Braught/Braucht, Bruner, Ruggles, Riley







*** Give the gift of Legacy for the holidays! Order online at 
http://legacyfamilytree.com/Redirect/Store-Legacy.asp or call 1-800-753-3453. 
***

Legacy User Group guidelines can be found at: 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

To find past messages, please go to our searchable archives at: 
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/

For online technical support, please visit 
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe please visit: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp


  • Re: [LegacyUG]... jean van horn
    • RE: [Lega... Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson-Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara-
      • [Lega... Connie
        • R... Sherry/Support
          • ... Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
      • Re: [... jean van horn
        • R... Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
          • ... Bob Janice
          • ... Cathy
            • ... Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara
          • ... Olds-Wills-Anderson-Simonson Hodges-Harris-Liikala-Jukkara

Reply via email to